I just tried to re-register to download the iPhone SDK, and after 5 attempts to get the registration email to my normal email address - handled by google apps - and nothing, i tried a different email address and , voila, it was there within seconds. Co-incidence or conspiracy?

Posted by Dorian Moore on Tuesday, October 7, 2008 at 13:21 GMT

It says here on NullRiver's Website that their NetShare data tethering app for the iPhone has been banned. Shame. That would have unlocked a much better world for me. I'd have paid my phone company to be able to use data tethering via my iPhone. It would be easier and cheaper than the 2 phones/1 phone and a dongle option.

It's added to the mass of dissapointments I've had with the iPhone and app store since their launch. I'm such a fan of Apple kit generally but the iPhone is starting to bug me more and more, especially the walled garden. As is much more clearly explained by others elsewhere having such a closed environment could be Apple's downfall in the mobile marketplace in the not-so-long term.

My list of gripes with the iPhone so far (not that we need another list of these)

* my settings/preferences being trashed when I upgrade some apps.

* inability to stream audio from iPhone to AirTunes

* inability to sync wirelessly, and copy files onto my iPhone at will

* the fact that no decent sync API appears to exist for 3rd party apps to I have to sync them manually, and frequenty via MobileMe. I've not check for this but I have 4 apps that all sync independntly of iTunes

* heavy iTunes dependency in the whole phone management system.

* The fact that if i switch iTunes libraries on my laptop I can't then sync ( i have a rather large iTunes library I don't take with me on my laptop, but I can't even sync my address book and calendar if I connect when launching this iTunes library)

* the usual suspects (bad 3g, bad battery life, no copy & paste, no multi-tasking, no inter application (or data) communication, app store policies/no freedom of distribution for applications, icons moving around on update, inability to remove 'core' apps, limitation of hardware/software access to third party apps (such as camera/gallery), no 'sms contact details', no mms )

* generally there is a lack of hackability which a lot of apple devotees (myself included) had come to expect because of OS X. Apple have got the balance wrong here.

Let's hope that Apple are investing some of that money they are surely making into fixing these problems. I'd really like for someone to jailbreak and hack Android onto the phone That may do the trick nicely.

Posted by Dorian Moore on Sunday, September 14, 2008 at 13:41 GMT

just checking out iTunes genius features. Was quite happy to be recommended a Charlemagne Palestine album I don't have, but - as expected - when there are no matches Apple tries to punt you the top selling albums. Hint to Apple: if you don't think my music exists, then it's pretty likely not going to be pop music, is it?

[Yes, I know I'm just being smug 'cos i have lots of music that won't likely ever exist in the iTunes store.]

Not Genius. Well Ghedalia Tazartes is in my opinion...

Posted by Dorian Moore on Wednesday, September 10, 2008 at 12:12 GMT

Something said elsewhere reminded me of this postcard my mum sent me in 1997. I've had it by my desk ever since, and is an adage I remind myself of often, one of my tenets in life. It was even my .sig for a while.

Opinions are the mind's way of making dung, they are what is left after we have stopped thinking.

I wondered who had originally said it, and so did a search: no references. Anyone? perhaps it was just the typographers - Typochondriacs, whoever they are/were - thoughts. It seems this card is perhaps long forgotten, so I thought I'd post it and save it. And the nice message from my mum - 'another obscure bit of designer typography for you'....

See also:

Opinions are like assholes; everyone has one and most are full of shit.

design: typochondriacs, 1997

Words: Alison Leeper, 1997

Tags : design typography,
Posted by Dorian Moore on Friday, May 9, 2008 at 15:22 GMT
Last modified Tuesday, May 6, 2008 at 14:29 GMT

I've just received a marketing email from MediaTemple. To my mobile phone. Twice. The email address for my phone is private, because I use it for paging me server warnings.

What's so bad about this? Well - I asked them to remove that email from their list , twice before, when they did the same thing. And was assured it had been. It's a pager address, which was put into their account manager to allow for notification of urgent issues ONLY. The last time I got SPAMmed at 3am, and got out of bed expecting a server to be down. This was when I had an account with them. I terminated SHOWstudio's account with MediaTemple last year due to their extortionate costs and decreasing quality of service. At the time I requested my account details be deleted from their databases, especially marketing databases.

OK, so this stuff happens all the time. However the service the provide is one of trust. It's not that they are selling newspapers, or Viagra, but I entrusted them with servers that contain thousands and thousands of peoples contact details ... might have even considered passing credit card details through a server hosted with them. And this is how they repay me? By not honoring opt-out requests and re-introducing old data back into their marketing databases!

Their opt out email address even bounced - not a good advert for an apparently savy tech company (though I have heard many complaints about them loosing email) :

And via a different mail server too:

The implication, to me is, basically: you can't trust this: http://www.mediatemple.net/company/legal/privacy.php
And therefore, you can't trust them with your details. MediaTemplate have some clever branding going on, but underneath my experience proves they aren't all that they say.

My worry is this: if they are unscrupulous enough to mine their administration databases for email accounts they can send unsolicited marketing emails to then where will it end? Would they use all the email addresses that are passed through their primary mail servers? Would they start greping backups stored on their servers (or even your hosted box) for email lists? Probably not. But I don't even want those questions raised in my mind about a server which is located on the other side of the world from me.

My other big concern: if an ISP acts like this then what chance have we of them acting against other people sending unsolicited email from their network?

My advice? If you have your servers hosted with MediaTemple then move them to The Planet... their service has been excellent, they are helpful and responsive, trustworthy and they don't send SPAM. And they are considerably cheaper. Win-win if you ask me.

Tags : hosting information security, mediatemple, privacy, spam,
Posted by Dorian Moore on Tuesday, April 3, 2007 at 14:33 GMT

At 18:50 this evening, our old Maidenhead datacentre was struck by lightning.

At the request of the Fire Service and Southern Electric, we powered-down all (approximately 200) servers in the building.

We are currently awaiting approval from the Fire Service and Southern Electric before powering-on these servers. We have been informed that this should be in approximately one and a half hours.

Well, hopefully it won't strike twice.

Posted by Dorian Moore on Monday, September 25, 2006 at 21:26 GMT

Here is an outline from his sister (also attached as PDF).

At 8.00am on Monday 1st of May 2006 my brother – Ernesto Leal (41) was arrested and taken from outside his home and held at Bishopsgate Police Station with a deportation order, he was later sent to Belmarsh Detention Centre.

Collette Bowens (my brother’s long term partner) was met by up to 30 police officers who had been in their home all night. Their home has been ransacked, his personal computer has been interfered with, personal papers and files (including his passport) have been removed and there was evidence of the back door to their home being forced open. On asking the Police Officer why they were there and how had they got in they were told that they had entered through the back door which had been left open, which it hadn’t.

Just over two years ago my brother was sentenced to 3 ½ years for GBH with intent. He served, on the judges advice 18 months where he served the majority of his sentence in an open prison, Ernesto was later released and electronically tagged for 4 months and reported weekly as part of his probation which was relaxed to once a month after 4 weeks.

My brother has no previous criminal record or convictions and this was his first offence.

The detention form states that he
• Is likely to abscond
• his release is not considered conducive to the public good

The deportation form states
• he will be deported to Jamaica

Had my brother been a threat to the general public he would not have been held in an open prison or have had early release or have been electronically tagged. If he was to abscond, there would be no where to go as his home is in London and no reason has been given to why he would be deported to Jamaica given that we are of Chilean origin.

My whole family arrived in the UK in 1977 when my brother was 13 yrs old as political refugees fleeing Pinochet, we were given sanctuary in the UK and have been given ‘indefinate leave to remain’. We have no immediate family left in Chile and he has very limited Spanish, we all consider out first language to be English.

Ernesto has spent his formative years in Scotland when my family was adopted by the Scottish National Union of Mineworkers and settled in Cowdenbeath, Fife. Myself and my brothers have gone through the education system here and have worked and started families in this country, he later moved to London.

I am appealing for questions to be made to The Home Office as to why my brother has been detained and to stop his deportation.

There is no question of his status in this country, he has been punished and has served his sentenced and should not be discriminated further, he has not committed any further offences and is therefore no cause for public concern, in addition to this several mistakes have been made by both the Home Office and The Metropolitan Police Force who carried out my brother’s arrest.

1. There was no Home Office case worker present so my family have been unable to petition for an appeal.
2. The Home Office detention officer did not have an up to date report from the probation services.
3. The arresting officers advised my brother’s partner that he was being arrested because he had not given his whereabouts. This was not the case as he had been tagged and reported to his probation officer once a week for the full time he was required to do so.
4. His status is not in question as he had previously provided, through lawyers, his passport with a Home Office stamp clearly stating that he has ‘indefinate leave to remain’.
5. He has been unnecessarily sent to a detention centre merely because there was no Home Office caseworker present.
6. My family was advised that his deportation to Jamaica could be a typo which is indicative of the mistakes made on my brothers case.

This process would have been facilitated had there been a Home Office Case worker been present during and throughout the arrest, we had all the documentation present at the Police Station and were not able to present our case and achieve a speedy solution and either have my brother out on bail or that his case be heard outside the detention centre.

Could you please email Diane Abbot MP, Ernesto Leal’s local MP at and ask her to ask questions to the Home Office regarding our concerns.

Ask why he has been arrested and why he is being deported?

Diane Abbot MP – 0207 219 3000 or 07947 598 225
Diane Abbot pa – Carol Glenn 0207 219 4426 or 07947 598 225
Diane Abbot press enquiries – Camilla Drejer 0207 219 4426

Or call :-

The Home Office Immigration and Nationality Directorate
UK Immigration Service
Criminal Casework Team
14th Floor, Lunar House
Croydon
CR9 2BY

Tel: 0208 196 0942
Fax: 0208 196 0930

Clearly stating it is regarding Ernesto Leal reference L306526

Posted by Dorian Moore on Tuesday, May 2, 2006 at 18:46 GMT

Batch video compression software don't crop the filenames of the 100 files I've asked you to compress and append them with your own naming scheme without giving me the option to override it.

I hate software which tries to be clever for stupid people, but can't be stupid for clever people. I know they are different files, just change the file extension. That's all I want. Hell, it's all I need.

Now I have to rename 100 files which have had the major identifying part of the filename over written, and that I can't identify the contents of because they are compressed in a video codec that doesn't have a native player.

Tags : compression interfaces, software, usability, video,
Posted by Dorian Moore on Saturday, March 18, 2006 at 09:36 GMT
Last modified Thursday, March 30, 2006 at 13:23 GMT

My response, which is trying to be concise but also explain the breadth of things I do:

Digital Media Technologist literally means that I am a technical specialist in digital media. I do many things, but mostly the are orientated around digital media:

* I design & build Web sites.

* I design & program Content Management Systems, Media Management Systems, Media Delivery Systems and E-commerce systems.

* I understand, use, manage, and sometimes develop digital media, in it's many forms: text, images, video, sound and at it's lowest level data.

* I move digital media around and understand how it is published in many places, from the Web to Radio and Television, to Mobile Phones, CD and DVD, and how it is used, consumed and remixed by people.

* I advise people on the best use of technology in the creative industries, primarily Music, Art and Fashion, as well as other places.

* I try to explain digital media and technology in a way that isn't scary to people who already work in one of those mediums.

* I train and tutor people.

* I have an active part in the development of various company strategies at a technical, and business, level.

Posted by Dorian Moore on Saturday, February 26, 2005 at 00:00 GMT
Last modified Thursday, October 20, 2005 at 20:22 GMT

I just found this site http://cert.startcom.org/ which is offering free SSL server certificates. Initially this seems like a great idea... but I think they miss the point slightly.

Wilst I'd agree with them that Verisign, Thawte (owned by Verisign) etc. are expensive for the service they provide, a large part of which can be automated, what they are doing isn't as simple as this page makes out.

As well as providing a certificate which provides encryption (which it's pretty trivial to do yourself without the sites need) they are also providing a trusted third party service (though, again, how far we want to trust Verisign is another matter).

This trusted third party makes a number of check on the applicant for a secure certificate, trying to legitimise the ir presence in the real world, and then sign the certificate. The signing means that you can be a bit more confident that the site you are engaging with is (relatively) legitimate.

I've just managed to set up a certificate through this site for one of my domains. The details aren't checked by them, and so I could have easily forged what I've entered. If they become a trusted Certificate Authority this certificate could now be used for phishing attacks.

One scenario is that users start to authorise all certificates issued by this Authority, without them being accepted by browser producers as a trusted Authority, and then being transmitted to a site which looks authentic, because the SSL certificate is there, and so seems secure. Most people don't look at SSL Certs - and indeed most, in my experience, are confused when they get prompts saying there is a problem with a cert, and take the path of least resistance not realising the implications.

In principal I like the idea of this kind of stuff, but it only works in a fully trustworthy world. And whilst it would be nice to be able to trust everyone it only take one 'bad apple' to spoil the fun for everything.

Posted by Dorian Moore on Friday, February 25, 2005 at 00:00 GMT
Last modified Thursday, October 20, 2005 at 20:22 GMT